Armstrong v. Agurerralde et al

Filing 21

ORDER adopting 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/9/2014. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
J. AGUERERRALDE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01622-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
[ECF No. 16]

Plaintiff Brady K. Armonstrong is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On July 5, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary

20

injunction. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

21

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 14, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

22

Recommendations which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that

23

Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not

24

file objections.

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

26

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

27

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 14, 2013, are adopted in full;

4

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is

5

DENIED.

3

and

6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

January 9, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2