Armstrong v. Agurerralde et al

Filing 41

ORDER adopting 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 35 and 37 Motions for Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/13/2014. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
J. AGUERERRALDE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01622-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUESTS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
[ECF Nos. 35, 37, 38]

Plaintiff Brady K. Armonstrong is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On June 30, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations to deny

20

Plaintiff’s requests for injunctive relief filed May 7, 2014, and June 26, 2014. The Findings and

21

Recommendations contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty (20) days. Plaintiff

22

did not file objections.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

24

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

25

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on June 30, 2014, are adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s requests for injunctive relief filed May 7, 2014, and June 26, 2014, are
DENIED.

4
5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

September 13, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2