Rosendo v. Crawford & Company et al

Filing 14

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/27/2013. (This Court ORDERS the parties, no later than 3/6/2013, to file papers to show cause why sanctions, including dismissal of this action, entry of default against defendants, or monetary sanctions, should not be imposed for disobedience of the 2/5/2013 order. This order to show cause will be discharged if, no later than 3/6/2013, papers are filed to dismiss this action in its entirety.) (Gaumnitz, R)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
SUSAN ROSENDO,

CASE NO. CV F 12-1641 LJO BAM

9
Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
(Doc. 13.)

10
vs.
11
CRAWFORD & COMPANY, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13

/

14

The parties have disobeyed this Court’s February 5, 2013 order to file papers, no later than

15

February 26, 2013, to dismiss or conclude this action. This Court’s Local Rule 11-110 provides that

16

failure to comply with an order of this Court “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and

17

all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”

18

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than March 6, 2013, to file papers to show

19

cause why sanctions, including dismissal of this action, entry of default against defendants, or monetary

20

sanctions, should not be imposed for disobedience of the February 5, 2013 order. This order to show

21

cause will be discharged if, no later than March 6, 2013, papers are filed to dismiss this action in its

22

entirety.

23

This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they are required to observe and comply

24

with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to

25

sanctions as this Court deems appropriate.

26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 27, 2013

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
66h44d
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1