Santos v. Holland et al
Filing
36
ORDER for Supplemental Briefing, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/9/16. Reply to Traverse Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MATTA J. SANTOS,
Petitioner,
12
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
v.
13
14
Case No. 1:12-cv-01651-LJO-EPG-HC
K. HOLLAND, et al.,
15
Respondents.
16
17
Petitioner Matta J. Santos is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas
18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In the petition, Petitioner challenges his confinement in the
19 security housing unit at Pelican Bay State Prison as a result of a gang validation that he contends
20 violated his right to due process. The Court finds that supplemental briefing would assist the
21 Court, especially given that Petitioner is now represented by counsel and Respondents filed an
22 answer to the original pro se petition.
23
24
25
26
27
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:
1. Within THIRTY (30) days of the date of service of this order, Respondent shall file a
reply to the traverse; and
2. Within THIRTY (30) days of the date of service of the Respondent’s reply, Petitioner
may file a supplemental traverse.
28 ///
1
1
All motions shall be submitted on the record and briefs filed without oral argument unless
2 otherwise ordered by the Court. Local Rule 230(l). Extensions of time will only be granted upon
3 a showing of good cause. All provisions of Local Rule 110 are applicable to this order.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 9, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?