Evans v. Soto

Filing 7

ORDER to Petitioner to Sign and Return the Consent or Decline Form Within Twenty-One (21) Days of Service, or Face Dismissal of the Action Without Prejudice for Petitioner's Failure to Comply With a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/8/2013. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 STEFAN E. EVANS, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 v. 14 SOTO, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12-cv—01652–BAM-HC ORDER TO PETITIONER TO SIGN AND RETURN THE CONSENT OR DECLINE FORM WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF SERVICE, OR FACE DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER (DOCS. 3, 5) ORDER TO THE CLERK TO SEND TO PETITIONER WITH THIS ORDER ANOTHER ORDER RE: CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT PETITIONER’S DEADLINE: TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER 19 20 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 21 forma pauperis with a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The 22 matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 23 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. Pending before 24 the Court is the petition, which was filed on October 9, 2012. 25 I. Background 26 Petitioner filed his petition and a motion for a sixty-day 27 extension of time within which to file a first amended petition. 28 1 1 Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time was denied on 2 December 17, 2012. 3 On October 10, 2012, an order issued from this Court to 4 Petitioner to complete and return to the Court within thirty (30) 5 days a form indicating whether Petitioner consented or declined 6 to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge to conduct all 7 further proceedings in this case. 8 the order was served by mail on Petitioner at the address listed 9 in the docket. 10 (Doc. 3-1.) On the same date, Over thirty days passed without Petitioner’s responding to the Court’s order as directed. 11 On November 21, 2012, another order issued from this Court 12 to Petitioner to complete and return to the Court within thirty 13 (30) days a form indicating whether or not Petitioner consented 14 or declined to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge to 15 conduct all further proceedings in this case. 16 same date, the order was served by mail on Petitioner at the 17 address listed in the docket. 18 Petitioner did not respond to the Court’s order as directed. 19 (Doc. 5.) On the Over thirty (30) days passed, but Both the orders informed Petitioner that the form must be 20 completed and returned regardless of the choice exercised by any 21 other party. 22 II. (Doc. 3-1 at 1; doc. 5.) Order to Complete Form or Suffer Dismissal of the Proceeding 23 Petitioner has failed to comply with the Court’s repeated 24 orders to complete and sign a form concerning consent or request 25 for reassignment. 26 A failure to comply with an order of the Court may result in 27 sanctions, including dismissal, pursuant to the inherent power of 28 2 1 the Court, federal statute, and the Federal Rules of Civil 2 Procedure. 3 v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 31, 42-43 (1991). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), 11; Local Rule 110; Chambers 4 Petitioner is being given one more opportunity to complete 5 and sign one section of the consent form and to return the form 6 to the Court. 7 complete, sign, and return the form within twenty-one days after 8 service of this order, the instant proceeding will be dismissed 9 without prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to comply with an 10 11 Petitioner is INFORMED that if he fails to order of the Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner is GRANTED 12 twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order to 13 complete, sign, and return the consent or decline portion of the 14 Court’s order re: consent or request for reassignment. 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10c20k January 8, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?