Sullivan v. Biter et.al.

Filing 67

ORDER Striking Plaintiff's 66 Objections for Lack of Signature; ORDER Granting Plaintiff Twenty Days to File Objections Bearing his Signature signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 06/13/2016. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
M. D. BITER, et al.,
Defendants.

16

1:12-cv-01662-AWI-EPG-PC
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS FOR LACK OF SIGNATURE
(ECF No. 66.)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF TWENTY
DAYS TO FILE OBJECTIONS BEARING
HIS SIGNATURE
TWENTY-DAY DEADLINE

17
18

Michael J. Sullivan (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

19

pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this case on

20

June 6, 2012, at the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (ECF

21

No. 1.) The case was transferred to the Eastern District of California on October 9, 2012.

22

(ECF No. 16.)

23

On June 6, 2016, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Court’s Findings and

24

Recommendations entered on February 17, 2016. (ECF No. 66.) The Objections are not

25

signed by Plaintiff. All filings submitted to the Court must bear the signature of the filing

26

party. Local Rule 131; Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Plaintiff’s Objections shall be stricken from the

27

record for lack of signature. Plaintiff shall be granted twenty days in which to file Objections

28

bearing his signature.

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

3
4

Plaintiff's Objections to the Findings and Recommendations, filed on June 6,
2016, are STRICKEN from the record for lack of Plaintiff’s signature; and

2.

5

Plaintiff is granted twenty days from the date of service of this order in which to
file Objections bearing his signature.

6
7

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 13, 2016

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE