Maldonado v. Committee Counsel Wasco R/C et al
Filing
22
ORDER DISMISSING Action for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief may be Granted signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/15/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ISRAEL MALDONADO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
COMMITTEE COUNSEL WASCO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12-cv-01670-SAB (PC)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF
MAY BE GRANTED
[ECF No. 21]
Plaintiff Israel Maldonado is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of
19
the United States Magistrate Judge on November 1, 2012. Local Rule 302.
On November 19, 2013, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a
20
21
claim upon which relief may be granted and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within
22
thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or
23
otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any
24
claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), it is HEREBY
2
ORDERED that:
3
1.
4
5
6
This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any claims
upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; and
2.
This dismissal is subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. '
1915(g). Silva v. Di Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098-99 (9th Cir. 2011).
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 15, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?