Olney v. Job.Com, Inc.

Filing 159

ORDER DENYING as MOOT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO SEAL 153 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/17/2014. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 PETER OLNEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 Case No. 1:12-cv-01724-LJO-SKO ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO SEAL v. (Docket No. 153) JOB.COM, and WINDY CITY CALL CENTER, LLAC Defendants, 19 20 _____________________________________/ 21 22 On July 7, 2014, Peter Olney (Plaintiff") filed a Notice of Request to Seal Documents. 23 (Doc. 153.) Plaintiff wishes to seal Exhibit 1, which is an audio CD, which Plaintiff received from 24 Defendant Job.com during the course of discovery. The CD was marked "confidential" pursuant 25 to a private confidentiality agreement among the parties. The parties currently dispute whether the 26 CD was appropriately marked confidential pursuant to the agreement. The parties' discovery 27 dispute regarding the confidentiality designation is set to be heard on July 30, 2014. Plaintiff has 28 submitted the CD to the Court to be considered as part of the discovery dispute. 1 The Court's electronic filing system, CM/ECF does not have the capability to upload or 2 otherwise "file" an audio CD. As a result, the CD will not be publicly available and has been 3 lodged with the Court for purposes of the discovery motion only. As the CD is not capable of 4 being "filed" on the docket and it will be lodged only, there is nothing for the Court to "seal." 5 Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to seal is DENIED as moot. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 17, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?