Olney v. Job.Com, Inc.
Filing
9
ORDER on 8 Stipulation to Extend Time for Job.Com, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/26/2012. (Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – LIVE SYSTEM (FRESNO)
10
11
PETER OLNEY, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
vs.
14
JOB.COM, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR JOB.COM, INC. TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill
Ctrm: 10
Peter Olney:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Job.com, Inc. has until December 5, 2012, to answer or
19
20
CASE NO. 1:12-CV-01724-LJO-GSA
Having considered the Stipulation by and between Defendant, Job.com, Inc., and Plaintiff,
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint.
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
November 26, 2012
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
DEAC_Signature-END:
28
6i0kij8d
1
Case No. 1:12-cv-01724-LJO-GSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?