Dury v. Copenhaver

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full; ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 06/03/2013. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

1:12-cv-01726-LJO-GSA-PC

MATTHEW JAMES DURY,

12

Plaintiff,

13

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL
(Doc. 31.)

vs.

14

PAUL COPENHAVER,

15

Defendant.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
(Doc. 18.)

16
17
18

Matthew James Dury (Aplaintiff@) is a federal proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

19

pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to

20

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On April 15, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

22

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief filed on November 26, 2012 be denied.

23

Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations

24

within thirty days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the

25

findings and recommendations.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

27

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

28

///
1

1

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

2

analysis.

3

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

4

1.

5

The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 15,
2013, are ADOPTED in full; and

6

2.

7

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on November 26, 2012
is DENIED.

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

11
12
13

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

June 3, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

b9ed48bb

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2