Corra v. Energizer Holdings Inc., et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER to CONTINUE mandatory schedulin conference. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 1/31/2013, is CONTINUED to 4/18/2013, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties' Joint Scheduling Report shall be filed no later than April 11, 2013, and shall also be emailed in Word or WordPerfect format to the Court at skoorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Telephonic appearances for the Scheduling Conference are APPROVED and e ncouraged. Any parties wishing to appear telephonically for the Scheduling Conference SHALL indicate this in the caption of their Joint Scheduling Report and all parties appearing telephonically shall coordinate one conference call to the Court at (559) 499-5790 at the time and date for the Scheduling Conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/17/2013. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 AIDA CORRAL, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.: 12-CV-01736-AWI-SKO 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON 16 19 ENERGIZER HOLDINGS INC., a Missouri Corporation; PLAYTEX PRODUCTS, INC, a Delaware Corporation; SUN PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 20 Defendants. 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Honorable Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge Courtroom 2 -- 8th Floor Action Filed: October 24, 2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff Aida Corral and Defendants Energizer Holdings, Inc., Playtex Products, Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Defendants”) jointly stipulate to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for January 31, 2013 pursuant to the Court’s October 25, 2012 Order (D.E. #4). WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Complaint in this action on October 24, 2012; WHEREAS, on November 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, Defendants will move to dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint on or before January 16, 2013 and briefing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss will be completed on February 27, 2013; WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and believe that it would be a better use of judicial resources to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference until after the Court has ruled on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Respectfully submitted, Dated: January 15, 2013 14 LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP MICHAEL J. REISS 15 16 By: /s/ Michael J. Reiss (as authorized on January 15, 2013) Attorneys for Defendants Energizer Holdings, Inc., Playtex Products, Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals, LLC 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: January 15, 2013 BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. PATRICIA N. SYVERSON By: /s/ Patricia N. Syverson Patricia N. Syverson Attorneys for Plaintiff Aida Corral 25 26 27 28 -1- STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 12-CV-01736-AWI-SKO CASE NO: 3:12-CV-01991-MMA (MDD) ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and due to the fact that a motion to dismiss is 3 currently pending and set to be heard on March 11, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 4 that: 5 1. The Scheduling Conference currently set for January 31, 2013, is 6 CONTINUED to April 18, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7; 7 8 2. The parties’ Joint Scheduling Report shall be filed no later than April 11, 9 2013, and shall also be emailed in Word or WordPerfect format to the Court at 10 skoorders@caed.uscourts.gov; 11 3. Telephonic appearances for the Scheduling Conference are APPROVED and 12 13 encouraged; 14 4. Any parties wishing to appear telephonically for the Scheduling Conference 15 SHALL indicate this in the caption of their Joint Scheduling Report; and 16 17 5. All parties appearing telephonically shall coordinate one conference call to the 18 Court at (559) 499-5790 at the time and date for the Scheduling Conference. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 22 January 17, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 23 24 ie14hje 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?