Corra v. Energizer Holdings Inc., et al
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER to CONTINUE mandatory schedulin conference. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 1/31/2013, is CONTINUED to 4/18/2013, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties' Joint Scheduling Report shall be filed no later than April 11, 2013, and shall also be emailed in Word or WordPerfect format to the Court at skoorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Telephonic appearances for the Scheduling Conference are APPROVED and e ncouraged. Any parties wishing to appear telephonically for the Scheduling Conference SHALL indicate this in the caption of their Joint Scheduling Report and all parties appearing telephonically shall coordinate one conference call to the Court at (559) 499-5790 at the time and date for the Scheduling Conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/17/2013. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
AIDA CORRAL, On Behalf of Herself
and All Others Similarly Situated,
Case No.: 12-CV-01736-AWI-SKO
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON
16
19
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS INC., a
Missouri Corporation; PLAYTEX
PRODUCTS, INC, a Delaware
Corporation; SUN
PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, a
Delaware Limited Liability Company,
20
Defendants.
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Honorable Sheila K. Oberto
United States Magistrate Judge
Courtroom 2 -- 8th Floor
Action Filed: October 24, 2012
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff Aida Corral and Defendants Energizer Holdings, Inc., Playtex Products,
Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Defendants”) jointly stipulate to continue the
Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for January 31, 2013 pursuant to the
Court’s October 25, 2012 Order (D.E. #4).
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Complaint in this action on October 24, 2012;
WHEREAS, on November 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, Defendants will move to dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint on
or before January 16, 2013 and briefing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss will be
completed on February 27, 2013;
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and believe that it would be a
better use of judicial resources to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference until
after the Court has ruled on Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January 15, 2013
14
LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP
MICHAEL J. REISS
15
16
By:
/s/ Michael J. Reiss
(as authorized on January 15, 2013)
Attorneys for Defendants
Energizer Holdings, Inc., Playtex Products,
Inc. and Sun Pharmaceuticals, LLC
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Dated: January 15, 2013
BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN
& BALINT, P.C.
PATRICIA N. SYVERSON
By:
/s/ Patricia N. Syverson
Patricia N. Syverson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Aida Corral
25
26
27
28
-1-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
12-CV-01736-AWI-SKO
CASE NO: 3:12-CV-01991-MMA (MDD)
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and due to the fact that a motion to dismiss is
3
currently pending and set to be heard on March 11, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
4
that:
5
1. The Scheduling Conference currently set for January 31, 2013, is
6
CONTINUED to April 18, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7;
7
8
2. The parties’ Joint Scheduling Report shall be filed no later than April 11,
9
2013, and shall also be emailed in Word or WordPerfect format to the Court at
10
skoorders@caed.uscourts.gov;
11
3. Telephonic appearances for the Scheduling Conference are APPROVED and
12
13
encouraged;
14
4. Any parties wishing to appear telephonically for the Scheduling Conference
15
SHALL indicate this in the caption of their Joint Scheduling Report; and
16
17
5. All parties appearing telephonically shall coordinate one conference call to the
18
Court at (559) 499-5790 at the time and date for the Scheduling Conference.
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
22
January 17, 2013
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
23
24
ie14hje
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?