Cauthen v. Rivera et al

Filing 63

ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Failure to Oppose Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/11/15: Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID SAFIDI CAUTHEN, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 RIVERA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:12cv01747 LJO DLB (PC) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff David Safidi Cauthen (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 18 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On November 13, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. The motion 21 included the requirements for opposing summary judgment. However, Plaintiff has not filed an 22 opposition. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 /// /// 28 1 1 2 3 This order serves to notify Plaintiff that if he does not file an opposition to the pending motion within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, it will be decided without his input. Defendants may file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition, if any, within seven (7) days of the date of service. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis February 11, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?