Soltero v. City of Bakersfield et al

Filing 10

ORDER to Vacate Hearing Date of January 10, 2013, Terminate 8 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and to File Second Amended Complaint signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/28/2012. Defendants shall file and serve papers to respond to the Second Amended Complaint by 1/23/2013. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CYNTHIA SOLTERO, 13 14 CASE NO. CV F 12-1791 LJO JLT Plaintiff, ORDER TO VACATE HEARING, TO TERM MOTION AND TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docs. 8,9.) vs. 15 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 / 18 Based on the parties’ December 28, 2012 stipulation, this Court: 19 1. DIRECTS the clerk to file plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit 20 A to the parties’ stipulation. The Second Amended Complaint will serve as plaintiffs’ 21 operative complaint at this time; 22 2. VACATES the January 10, 2013 hearing on defendants’ F.R.Civ.P. 12 motion to dismiss 23 plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint as the stipulated Second Amended Complaint 24 renders moot the motion to dismiss; 25 3. 26 27 28 DIRECTS the clerk to term the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (doc. 8); and 4. ORDERS defendants, no later than January 23, 2012, to file and serve papers to respond to the Second Amended Complaint. 1 1 This Court will take no further action on the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (doc. 8). 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?