Soltero v. City of Bakersfield et al

Filing 22

ORDER re 21 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and Allowing the Plaintiff to File a Third Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/6/2014. Third Amended Complaint due by 6/11/2014. Expert Discovery Deadline 10 /7/2014. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 10/22/2014; Hearing by 11/14/2014. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 11/21/2014; Hearing by 1/6/2015. Settlement Conference reset for 1/20/2015 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference reset for 2/25/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial reset for 4/21/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Michael G. Marderosian, No. 77296 Heather S. Cohen, No. 263093 MARDEROSIAN, CERCONE & COHEN 1260 Fulton Mall Fresno, CA 93721 Telephone: (559) 441-7991 Facsimile: (559) 441-8170 6 7 8 9 10 11 Virginia Gennaro, No. 138877 City Attorney CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone: (661) 326-3721 Facsimile: (661) 852-2020 12 Attorneys for: 13 Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, TIMOTHY BERCHTOLD And JASON FELGENHAUER 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYNTHIA SOLERO, individually and as ) Case No. 1:12-CV-01791-LJO-JLT Successor in Interest of VINCENT ) MATTHEW YZAGUIRRE, DECEASED, ) STIPULATION TO MODIFY ) SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiffs, ) AND ALLOWING THE PLAINTIFF ) TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED vs. ) COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON ) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, TIMOTHY ) (Doc. 21) BERCHTOLD, JASON FELGENHAUER, ) and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 27 28 1 1 Plaintiff CYNTHIA SOLTERO and defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, 2 TIMOTHY BERCHTOLD, and JASON FELGENHAUER, by and through their counsel 3 of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 4 STIPULATION 5 1. The parties STIPULATE and AGREE that the Court should enter an Order 6 amending the scheduling order in this case, such that the schedule be modified as 7 follows: 8 Deadline/Hearing Current Date Requested Date 9 Expert Witness Disclosures --- 09/02/14 10 Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures --- 09/16/14 11 Expert Discovery Cutoff 06/02/14 10/07/14 12 File Non-Dispositive Motions --- 10/22/14 13 Hear Non-Dispositive Motions 06/02/14 11/14/14 14 File Dispositive Motions 06/09/14 11/21/14 15 Hear Dispositive Motions 07/23/14 12/31/14 16 Mandatory Settlement Conference 08/07/14 01/20/15 17 Pretrial Conference 09/03/14 02/19/15 18 Trial 10/21/14 03/23/15 19 2. The parties STIPULATE and AGREE that the plaintiff may file a Third 20 Amended Complaint naming Robert Yzaguirre, the decedent’s father, as a party to this 21 action so that any and all claims arising from the death of Matthew Vincent Yzaguirre 22 may be fully and finally adjudicated in a single action. A true and correct copy of the 23 plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 24 25 26 GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER AND TO PERMIT DEFENDANTS TO FILE A CROSS COMPLAINT 3. Good cause exists to modify the scheduling conference order and to permit 27 the plaintiff to file a Third Amended Complaint. The parties have agreed to stipulate to 28 the above terms because: 2 1 2 3 a. Plaintiff Cynthia Soltero seeks to recover damages as the result of the death of her son, Vincent Matthew Yzaguirre. b. Decedent Vincent Matthew Yzaguirre’s father, Robert Yzaguirre, is 4 alive but was not previously named as a party in this lawsuit. It is believed that Mr. 5 Yzaguirre is currently incarcerated in Salinas Valley State Prison in Soledad, California. 6 c. Plaintiff wishes to file a Third Amended Complaint to name Mr. 7 Yzaguirre as a party so that all claims arising from the death of Vincent Matthew 8 Yzaguirre are fully and finally adjudicated in a single action as is contemplated by 9 California Code of Civil Procedure Section 377.60. 10 d. Plaintiff and defendants mediated this matter and reached a settlement 11 in principal but such settlement is contingent on it being a full and final adjudication of 12 all claims that could have been brought as a result of the death of Vincent Matthew 13 Yzaguirre. As a result, it is necessary to name Robert Yzaguirre as a party to ensure a 14 full and final adjudication of this matter. 15 16 Dated: June 5, 2014. MARDEROSIAN, CERCONE & COHEN 17 /s/ Michael G. Marderosian 18 By:________________________________ Michael G. Marderosian, Attorneys for Defendants above-named. 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: June 5, 2014. LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL GIBALEVICH 25 26 27 28 /s/ Daniel A. Gibalevich By:________________________________ Daniel A. Gibalevich, Attorneys for Plaintiff 3 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS: 1. The stipulation for Plaintiff to file the third amended complaint which was attached to the stipulation as Exhibit A, is GRANTED. Plaintiff SHALL file the third amended complaint within three court days; 2. Defendants SHALL file their responsive pleading to the third amended complaint within 20 days after its filing; 3. The scheduling order is amended as follows: 10 a. Expert witnesses SHALL be disclosed no later than 09/02/14; 11 b. Rebuttal expert witnesses SHALL be disclosed no later than 09/16/14; 12 c. All expert discovery SHALL be completed by 10/07/14; 13 d. Non-dispositive motions SHALL be filed no later than 10/22/14 and heard no later than 11/14/14; 14 e. 15 Dispositive motions SHALL be filed no later than 11/21/14 and heard no later than 01/06/15; 16 17 f. The settlement conference is reset on 01/20/15 at 9:30 a.m.; 18 g. The pretrial conference is reset on 02/25/15 at 8:30 a.m.; 19 h. The trial is reset on 04/21/15 at 8:30 a.m.; 20 21 4. Within 90 days, counsel SHALL file a joint report detailing the status of the settlement negotiations. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?