Burns v. MacDonald
Filing
11
ORDER DENYING Petitioner's 10 Motion for Default Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/7/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KENNETH JEFFERSON BURNS,
Case No. 1:12-cv-01820 GSA HC
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Petitioner,
10
v.
11
[ECF NO. 10]
12
JAMES MACDONALD, Warden,
13
Respondent.
14
15
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge
17 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
18
On December 13, 2012, the Court dismissed the petition and terminated the case.
19 Judgment was entered on the same date. On October 3, 2013, Petitioner filed the instant request
20 for a default judgment. Petitioner complains that the California Supreme Court has not acted on
21 his petition for review of his claims within a reasonable time period. Petitioner is advised that
22 his federal habeas case was terminated on December 13, 2012. Therefore, the motion must be
23 denied for lack of jurisdiction. In addition, federal courts do not exercise supervisory powers
24 over state courts. Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994). Petitioner’s remedy lies with the state
25 court.
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
ORDER
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for default judgment is
2
3 DENIED.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
8
October 7, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?