Cogswell v. Cate
Filing
2
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/14/12. New Case Number 2:12-cv-02807-CKD. Old Case Number 1:12-cv-01823-BAM. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HENRY IVAN COGSWELL,
1:12-cv-01823-BAM (HC)
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
Petitioner,
13
14
vs.
15
MATTHEW CATE,
Respondent.
16
/
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to
18
19
28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 1915.
21
The petitioner is challenging conditions of confinement arising in Lassen County, which
22
is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
23
California. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the Sacramento Division.
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
25
court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action
26
will be transferred to the Sacramento Division.
-1-
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
3
4
5
California sitting in Sacramento; and
2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall
be filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3em3ec
November 14, 2012
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?