Hanna v. County of Mariposa et al

Filing 19

ORDER DISREGARDING Plaintiff's 18 Response to Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/20/2013. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD CHARLES HANNA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. COUNTY OF MARIPOSA, et al., 15 Case No. 1:12-cv-01885-AWI-SAB ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO ORDER (ECF No. 18) Defendants. 16 17 18 On November 12, 2013, District Judge Anthony W. Ishii issued an order relating this 19 action to Hanna v. Mariposa County Sheriff Dept., No. 1:12-cv-00501-AWI-SAB (E.D. Cal.), 20 and the action was referred to the undersigned to determine if the dismissal of this action with 21 prejudice should be set aside. On November 14, 2013, an order issued directing Plaintiff’s 22 attorney, Eugene Action, to file a response to Plaintiff’s allegations that this action was dismissed 23 without Plaintiff’s consent or approval. On November 19, 2013, Plaintiff filed a response. 24 Plaintiff is advised that should the Court require additional information from him on this 25 matter, an order will issue directing him to respond. In this instance, the Court did not order 26 Plaintiff to respond and Plaintiff’s response shall be disregarded. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s response to the order relating cases is HEREBY DISREGARDED. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2013 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?