Chan et al v. Doctors Hospital Modesto et al

Filing 44

ORDER for Dismissal of Defendant United States of America and Remand to State Court, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/8/13. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 PEN CHAN and J.C., a minor by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, YOLANDA TORRES, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DOCTORS HOSPITAL MODESTO, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Case No. 1:12-CV-01909-AWI-GSA ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND REMAND TO STATE COURT Based on the stipulation of the parties filed herein on February 8, 2013, IT IS HEREBY 15 ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed against defendant United States of America,1 with 16 prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 17 Upon dismissal of the United States, the Court has no further jurisdiction over this action. 18 Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of this action, to wit, Plaintiffs claims 19 against Defendants Doctors Medical Center of Modesto, Inc. (erroneously sued herein as Doctors 20 Hospital Modesto), Fred Adams, M.D., and non-federal Does 1 through 20, inclusive, is hereby 21 remanded back to Stanislaus County Superior Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 February 8, 2013 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 1 On May 18, 2012, the United States of America was substituted in lieu of party defendant Sylvia Diego, M.D., pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d), whereby all claims against Dr. Diego were dismissed with prejudice. See Doc. #2. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?