Cervantes et al v. Cemex, Inc.

Filing 119

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 117 Motion to Stay Pending Appeal signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/18/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 María G. Díaz, SBN 220087 Kirby Fernando Cañon, SBN 276414 2 THE DIAZ LAW FIRM 7045 N. Maple Ave., Suite 107 3 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 321-8880 4 Facsimile: (559) 321-8878 Kirbv@mdliazlaw.com 5 Maria@mdiazlaw.com 6 Nathan Goldberg SBN:61292 ALLRED MAROKO GOLDBERG 7 6300 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, CA 90048 8 Telephone No. (323) 653-6530 Fax No. (323) 653-1660 9 NGoldberg@amglaw.com 10 11 Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS, JOSE CERVANTES and JORGE MONTES 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 JOSE CERVANTES, an Individual; and JORGE MONTES, an Individual, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 vs. 18 CEMEX, INC., a Corporation; and DOES 1 19 to 50, inclusive, 20 21 Defendants. CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01932-LJO-JLT ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d) Date: March 30, 2015 Time: 8:30 a.m. Courtroom: 4, 7th Floor Judge: Hon. Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 1 ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d) Case No. 1:12-cv-01932-LJO-JLT 1 After consideration of Plaintiffs Motion For Approval of a Stay Pending Appeal 2 Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d), all other papers filed herein, the records of the case, 3 4 and the oral argument on the Motion, if any, and good cause appearing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 5 1) Plaintiffs’ Bank of The West Cashier’s Check, Check No. 1001788597, in the amount of $1,677.42 is APPROVED. 6 7 2) Plaintiffs are directed to deliver the $1,677.42 Cashier’s Check to the Clerk or Chief Deputy Clerk of the United States District Court, Eastern District, Fresno within 7 court days of the signing of this Order. 8 9 3) These funds satisfy this Court’s Order on Defendant’s Bill of Costs, which tax the Plaintiffs $1,341.93 in costs – including any applicable interest. 10 4) The Clerk may use the Cashier’s Check deposited to acknowledge the $1,341.93 in costs taxed by this Court, Dkt. #111, and any applicable interest, as soon as the pending appeal with the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 14-17437, is terminated by Court order or the Parties reach a resolution regarding the disposition of the Cashier’s Check. 11 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 Good cause having been shown and in light of Defendant’s statement of non-opposition, Plaintiffs’ motion to stay enforcement of the bill of costs is GRANTED. The hearing on the 18 motion, currently set for March 30, 2015, is VACATED. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: March 18, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SECURITY AND A STAY PENDING APPEAL PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d) Case No. 1:12-cv-01932-LJO-JLT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?