Edison v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/3/2013 vacating 1/7/2013, 1/28/2013 hearing dates and referring pending 6 MOTION to DISMISS and 15 MOTION to DISMISS to Magistrate Judge Sheila Oberto. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GEO GROUP, Inc., MANAGEMENT & )
TRAINING CORP (MTC) Inc., and
)
DOES 1-50,
)
)
Defendants
)
____________________________________)
)
GREGORY EDISON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
GEO GROUP, Inc., MANAGEMENT & )
TRAINING CORP (MTC) Inc., and
)
DOES 1-50,
)
)
Defendants
)
____________________________________)
GREGORY EDISON,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
RELATED CASES
1:12-CV-1654 AWI SKO
1:12-CV-1933 AWI SKO
ORDER VACATING JANUARY 7,
2013 HEARINGS, JANUARY 28, 2013
HEARINGS, AND MARCH 4, 2012
HEARING
ORDER REFERRING PENDING
MOTIONS TO DISMISS TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHEILA
OBERTO
23
24
Plaintiff was a federal prisoner at Taft Correctional Facility (“Taft”). Plaintiff alleges that
25
entities running Taft violated state and federal law while Plaintiff was incarcerated there.
26
Specifically, Plaintiff contends that Defendants were negligent by housing Plaintiff at a location
27
known for Valley Fever (Coccidioidomycosis), failing to properly mitigate Plaintiff’s exposure to
28
Valley Fever, and neglecting to appropriately treat Plaintiff’s Valley Fever, after Plaintiff
1
contracted it.
2
For unknown reasons, Plaintiff has filed a total of three actions concerning these events.1
3
The various Defendants in these actions have now filed motions to dismiss and set these motions
4
to dismiss for several different hearing dates.
5
forth below:
6
The court’s understanding of the three cases is set
Case 1:12-cv-1654 AWI SKO, is proceeding on Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint,
7
filed on November 14, 2012.
8
America, the GEO Group, and Management & Training Corporation (“MTC”) as Defendants.
9
Case 1:12-cv-1654 AWI SKO alleges a negligence cause of action against the United States of
10
American, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, for Defendants’ failure to provide Plaintiff
11
with a safe and habitable prison and for the United States of American’s failure to operate and
12
maintain Taft in a safe and habitable condition.
13
the United States of American breached its duty of care under 18 U.S.C. § 4042(a). Finally, Case
14
1:12-cv-1654 AWI SKO alleges that the GEO Group and MTC were negligent in failing to
15
provide, operate, and maintain a safe and habitable prison.
16
In 1:12-cv-1654 AWI SKO, Plaintiff names the United States of
Case 1:12-cv-1654 AWI SKO also alleges that
Case 1:12-cv-1933 AWI SKO was originally filed in the Kern County Superior Court on
17
October 9, 2012. This action names the GEO Group and MTC as Defendants. Case 1:12-cv-
18
1933 AWI SKO alleges Defendants were negligent for failing to provide a safe and habitable
19
prison and Defendants were negligent in their use of the premises. As with Case 1:12-cv-1654
20
AWI SKO, Case 1:12-cv-1933 AWI SKO is also based on allegations that Taft is located on a
21
site immersed in the airborne spores that case Valley Fever and Defendants failed to implement
22
preventative measures to protect Plaintiff from the infection he now carries.
23
Defendants and Plaintiff are citizens of different states, on November 26, 2012, Defendants
24
removed Case 1:12-cv-1933 AWI SKO to this court.
Because
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff is encouraged to review his three cases. Plaintiff is advised to either dismiss
duplicative cases or request that all cases be consolidated and proceed with an amended
complaint.
2
1
Case 1:12-cv-2026 AWI SKO was filed on December 13, 2012. Case 1:12-cv-2026
2
AWI SKO names the United States of America, the GEO Group, and MTC as Defendants. Case
3
1:12-cv-2026 AWI SKO alleges a negligence cause of action against the United States of
4
American, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, for the United States of America’s failure to
5
provide inmates with a safe and habitable prison and for the United States of American’s failure
6
to operate and maintain prison facilities in safe and habitable conditions. Case 1:12-cv-2026
7
AWI SKO also alleges the United States of American breached its duty of care under 18 U.S.C. §
8
4042(a). Finally, case 1:12-cv-2026 AWI SKO alleges the GEO Group and MTC were negligent
9
in failing to provide, operate, and maintain a safe and habitable prison.
10
As stated above, multiple motions have been filed in Case 1:12-cv-1654 AWI SKO and
11
Case 1:12-cv-1933 AWI SKO.2
12
filed a motion to dismiss set for hearing on January 7, 2013; Defendant United States of
13
America has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction set for hearing on March 4, 2013;
14
and, Defendant MTC has set a motion to dismiss for hearing on January 28, 2013.
15
1:12-cv-1933 AWI SKO: Defendant GEO Group filed a motion to dismiss set for hearing on
16
January 7, 2013; and, Defendant MTC has set a motion to dismiss for hearing on January 28,
17
2013.
18
In Case 1:12-cv-1654 AWI SKO: Defendant GEO Group has
In Case
The court has reviewed the five pending motions in Case 1:12-cv-1654 AWI SKO and
19
case 1:12-cv-1933 AWI SKO. The pending motions all concern whether Plaintiff has exhausted
20
relevant administrative remedies and whether the complaints’ allegations about Taft’s conditions
21
state a claim for negligence. Because these cases and the pending motions concern prison
22
conditions, the court finds that these motion should be referred to Magistrate Judge Sheila Oberto
23
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72 for the entry for Findings and
24
Recommendations.
25
26
27
28
2
Given the early procedural posture of 1:12-cv-2026 AWI SKO, no motions have yet
been filed in this case.
3
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
4
1:12-cv-1933 AWI SKO are REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Sheila Oberto;
2.
5
6
The five pending motions to dismiss in Case 1:12-cv-1654 AWI SKO and Case
The hearing dates before the undersigned on January 7, 2013, January 28, 2013,
and March 4, 2012 are VACATED;
3.
In the event Magistrate Judge Sheila Oberto desires to hold a hearing on some or
7
all of the pending motions, Magistrate Judge Sheila Oberto’s Chambers will
8
contact the parties and set a hearing date at Magistrate Judge Sheila Oberto’s
9
convenience.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:
0m8i78
January 3, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?