Edison v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al

Filing 19

ORDER of RECUSAL signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/4/2013. Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto no longer assigned to case. New Case Number: 1:12-cv-01933-AWI-GSA. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY EDISON, CASE NO. 1:12-cv-1933-AWI-SKO 12 13 Related Cases: 1:12-cv-2026-AWI-SKO 1:12-cv-1654-AWI-SKO Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 ORDER RE RECUSAL 16 THE GEO GROUP, INC., and DOES 1-50, 17 Defendants. 18 / 19 20 On December 19, 2012, the district court issued an order (Doc. 8) indicating that this case 21 is similar to Edison v. United States et al., 1:12-cv-1654-AWI-SKO in that both cases appear to 22 involve similar questions of fact and law such that assignment to the same district judge and 23 magistrate judge is likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial effort. See Local Rule 183. 24 Therefore, the district court ordered that this case be reassigned to the undersigned magistrate judge. 25 (Doc. 6.) 26 On January 4, 2013, the undersigned recused herself from case number 1:12-cv-1654-AWI- 27 SKO. The undersigned also recuses herself from this related matter. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The undersigned recuses herself as magistrate judge to whom this case is assigned; 3 2. This case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin; and 4 3. All future pleadings filed with this Court shall use the following case number: 5 1:12-cv-1933-AWI-GSA 6 7 Failure to use the correct case number may result in a delay in the document being received by the correct judicial officer. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj January 4, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?