Anderson v. Cahlander et al

Filing 17

ORDER Adopting 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's 8 Motion for Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/15/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

DION ANDERSON,
12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

vs.
L. CAHLANDER, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12cv01966 LJO DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
(Document 16)

Plaintiff Dion Anderson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

18
19
20
21
22

pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 3, 2012. On
January 7, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Injunctive Relief. The matter was referred to a
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 7, 2013, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations that the Motion for

23

Injunctive Relief be DENIED. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and

24

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days. Over fourteen days

25

have passed and Plaintiff has not filed objections.

26
27
28

1

1
2
3
4

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the proper legal analysis.

5

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

6

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on June 7, 2013, are ADOPTED IN

7
8

FULL; and
Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief, filed on January 7, 2013, is DENIED.

2.

9
10
11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

July 15, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

66h44d

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2