United States of America v. Hampton
Filing
7
ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/27/2013 adopting in full 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
12
13
14
Petitioner,
v.
1: 12-cv-01984-LJO-BAM
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS RE: PETITION
FOR JUDICIAL APPROVAL OF LEVY
ON PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE
LINDA J. HAMPTON,
Respondent.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
In this civil forfeiture action, the United States of America (“Petitioner”) seeks judicial
approval of a levy upon Linda J. Hampton’s (“Respondent”) principal residence to satisfy
Respondent’s unpaid federal income tax liabilities, interest, and penalties for the 1991, 1992,
1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2009 tax years.
On March 4, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations
recommending that the Government’s Petition be granted. (Doc. 6.) The Findings and
Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any
objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No
objections to the findings and recommendations were filed with the Court.
28
Page 1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
2
a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings
3
and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations, filed
March 4, 2013, are adopted in full.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
March 27, 2013
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
66h44d
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?