Heine et al v. Vilsack et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request that defendants Dr. Inderjeet Pannu and the USDA's response to plaintiffs' second amended complaint will now be due on/or before 10/15/2013. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/1/2013. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 BENJAMIN E. HALL Assistant United States Attorney 3 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, CA 93721 4 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No. 1:12-CV-01992-AWI-SMS 12 David Shayne Heine, California Veal Tech, Inc. a California corporation, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 Tim Vilsack in His Official Capacity as United 16 States Secretary of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture, United States 17 Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspections Service, Yudhbir Sharma, DVM, 18 USDA Employee Known Only as “Dr. Pannu,” USDA Employee Known only as “Ken,”USDA 19 Employee Known only as “Dr. Redding,” USDA Employee Known Only as “Dr. 20 Henley,” Dr. Amy Lieder, Penny Patrali and DOES 1-100 inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, David Shayne Heine and California Veal Tech, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants 24 United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and Dr. Inderjeet Pannu, hereby stipulate and 25 agree as follows: 26 1. Pursuant to the Court’s Order (Doc. 25) on the parties’ prior stipulation, the response 27 of defendants Dr. Inderjeet Pannu and USDA to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 26) is 28 due on or before October 4, 2013. 30 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2. 1 As a result of the lapse in appropriations and federal government shutdown, the 2 undersigned defense counsel is on furlough status as of October 1, 2013, and will be prohibited from 3 conducting any work on behalf of the defendants until further notice. The parties accordingly 4 request that the October 4, 2013, deadline be extended to October 15, 2013. 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 Dated: October 1, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 7 / /s/ Benjamin E. Hall BENJAMIN E. HALL Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendants 8 9 10 Dated: October 1, 2013 THE ZUMWALT LAW FIRM, APC. 11 [Authorized September 30, 2013] 12 / /s/ Graham S. Lopez GRAHAM S. LOPEZ Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 ORDER 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: 19 October 1, 2013 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 20 21 icido34h 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?