Heine et al v. Vilsack et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING the parties' request to vacate the pending Motion to Dismiss hearing, document 32 , currently on Judge Ishii's 12/9/2013 calendar, as a third amended complaint will be filed on or before 12/9/2013. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/2/2013. (Rooney, M)

Frank T. Zumwalt, Esq., SBN. 132746
Graham S. Lopez, Esq., SBN. 236077
2 T H E Z U M W A L T L A W F I R M , APC.
1600 G Street, Suite 104
3 Modesto, California 95354
Telephone No: [phone]
4
Facsimile No: [phone]
1

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

6 DAVID SHAYNE HEINE
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

David Shayne Heine, California Veal Tech,
Inc. a California Corporation

10

CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-01992-AWI-SMS

11

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
PLAINTIFFS
TO
FILE
THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,

12
13

vs.

14

Tom Vilsack in His Official Capacity as
United States Secretary of Agriculture,
United States Department Of Agriculture,
United States Department Of Agriculture
Food Safety and Inspection Service, Yudhbir
Sharma, DVM, USDA Employee Known
Only as "Dr. Pannu," USDA Employee
Known only as "Ken," USDA Employee
Known only as "Dr. Redding," USDA
Employee Known Only as "Dr. Henley," Dr.
Amy Lieder, Penny Patrali and DOES 1 –
100 inclusive,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Defendants.

23

Plaintiffs, David Shayne Heine and California Veal Tech, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”), and

24

25 Defendants United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and Dr. Inderjeet Pannu, hereby
26 stipulate and agree as follows:
27
28
Page 1 of 2 

T HE  Z UMWALT 
L AW  F IRM, APC 

1600 G STREET 
SUITE 104 
MODESTO, CA 95354 
T:  209  577‐6100 
F:  209  577‐1038 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 

1.

1

The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the third, fourth, fifth and sixth

2 causes of action alleged in the plaintiffs' second amended complaint ("SAC"). The motion is set
3 to be heard on December 9, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom 2.
4

2.

The motion to dismiss will be taken off calendar and plaintiffs will file a third

5
6
7

amended complaint ("TAC") by December 9, 2013. The TAC will not have the third, fourth,
fifth and sixth causes of action alleged in the SAC.

8

3.

The plaintiffs have filed a claim with the defendant USDA for the relief sought in

9 the third, fourth, fifth and sixth causes of action alleged in the SAC. If and when the claim is
10

rejected, the plaintiffs may seek leave of the Court to file a fourth amended complaint asserting

11
12

additional claims. Defendants reserve all objections to such further amendment and to such

13 additional claims, if any.
14
15

Respectfully submitted:
Dated: November 27, 2013

16
17

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney

19

/s/ Benjamin E. Hall
BENJAMIN E. HALL
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Defendants

20

THE ZUMWALT LAW FIRM, LLP

18

21

Dated: November 27, 2013

22
23

/s/ Graham Lopez
.
GRAHAM LOPEZ
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ORDER

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26 Dated: 12/2/2013
27

/s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER
HON. SANDRA M. SNYDER
United States Magistrate Judge

28
Page 2 of 2 

T HE  Z UMWALT 
L AW  F IRM, APC 

1600 G STREET 
SUITE 104 
MODESTO, CA 95354 
T:  209  577‐6100 
F:  209  577‐1038 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT