Curtis v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER for DISMISSAL with Prejudice signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/1/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Albert George Curtis

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS,

12
13
14
15

) No. 1:12-cv-02010-AWI-GSA
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.
LOWE’S HIW, INC., a WASHINGTON
CORPORATION dba LOWE’S aka
LOWE’S #1611,

16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Albert George Curtis and

21

Defendant Lowe’s HIW, Inc., a Washington Corporation dba Lowe’s aka Lowe’s #1611

22

(“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

23

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its

24

entirety.

25

Date: March 1, 2013

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

26

/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Albert George Curtis

27
28

Curtis v. Lowe’s HIW, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order

Page 1

1

Date: March 1, 2013

HUNTON & WILLIAMS

2
3

/s/ M. Brett Burns
M. Brett Burns
Attorneys for Lowe’s HIW, Inc., a
Washington Corporation dba Lowe’s aka
Lowe’s #1611

4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9
The parties having so stipulated,

10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 1, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

0m8i788

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Curtis v. Lowe’s HIW, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order

Page 2