Edison v. United States of America et al

Filing 33

Order re STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint 32 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/20/2013. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 6/27/2013 at 09:00 AM at the United States Courthouse, 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
ALYSON A. BERG
Assistant United States Attorney
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

GREGORY EDISON

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE GEO )
GROUP, INC.; MANAGEMENT &
)
TRAINING CORPORATION; and JOHN
)
DOES 1-50,
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No. 1:12−CV−02026 AWI−JLT
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT; ORDER

17

Plaintiff Gregory Edison (“Plaintiff”), Defendants United States of America (“United

18

States”), GEO Group, Inc (“GEO”) and Management & Training Corporation (“MTC”) (collectively

19

“the parties”) stipulate, by and through the undersigned counsel, to extend the deadline for United

20

States to respond to the complaint to and including April 8, 2013.

21

The parties further agree to continue the date of the scheduling conference currently set for

22

April 9, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Thurston in Bakersfield, California to June 27,

23

2013 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Thurston in Bakersfield, California.
The parties base this stipulation on good cause, which includes the need for United States to

24
25

review the allegations in the Complaint and respond accordingly.

26

///

27

///

28

///

29
30

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

1

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree to continue the time for the United States to file a

1
2

responsive pleading to the Complaint and the scheduling conference as specified below, and base it

3

on the above-stated good cause. The parties request the court to endorse this stipulation by way of

4

formal order.
Old Date

New Date

United States’ response
to Complaint

March 8, 2013

April 8, 2013

Scheduling Conference

April 9, 2013

June 27, 2013 @9:00

5
6
7
8

Respectfully submitted,

9
10

Dated: February 20, 2013

11

/s/Alyson A. Berg
Alyson A. Berg
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant United States of America

12
13
14

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Dated: February 20, 2013

FELDMAN AND WALLACH

15
(As authorized 02/20/2013)

16

/s/Ian Michael Wallach
Ian Michael Wallach
Attorneys for Plaintiff Gregory Edison

17
18

Dated: February 20, 2013

19

BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP
(As authorized 02/20/2013)

/s/Susan E. Coleman
Susan E. Coleman
Attorney for Defendants The GEO Group, Inc.
and Management & Training Corporation (MTC)

20
21
22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

29
30

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

2

ORDER

1

Having reviewed the stipulation submitted the parties, the court hereby extends the time
2

for the United States’ to respond to the complaint to April 8, 2013. The scheduling conference

3
currently set for April 9, 2013 is hereby continued to June 27, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

February 20, 2013

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
DEAC_Signature-END:

8

9j7khijed

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

3