Zamora v. Vento et al

Filing 10

ORDER DISREGARDING Plaintiff's Motion Regarding Legal Mail 7 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/22/13. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUDY ZAMORA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 VENTO, et al., 15 Case No. 1:12-cv-02029 DLB PC ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION REGARDING LEGAL MAIL (Document 7) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Rudy Zamora (“Plaintiff”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action on December 14, 2012. The complaint is currently 19 awaiting screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 1 On January 14, 2013, Plaintiff filed a letter inquiring about a copy of a request slip sent on 20 21 December 11, 2012. It appears that the request slip related to grievances that Plaintiff had filed 22 while in custody at the Kings County Jail. Plaintiff states that he has reason to believe that the jail is 23 tampering with his legal mail and would like to file a motion. The Court DISREGARDS the instant letter, which cannot be construed as a motion. 24 25 Moreover, the Court does not have information relating to Plaintiff’s request slip sent from his place 26 of incarceration. Plaintiff may file a motion for equitable relief if he believes that such a motion is 27 necessary. 28 1 On December 21, 2012, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. 1 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 Dated: /s/ Dennis L. Beck July 22, 2013 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE D C_Si gnat ue EN : EA r- D 3b142a 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?