Johnson v. Sisodia, et al.
Filing
36
ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Response to 34 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Discovery Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/3/2015. Response due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY JOHNSON,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. SISODIA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12-cv-02044-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE
A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
EXTEND THE DISCOVERY DEADLINE
[ECF No. 34]
Plaintiff Anthony Johnson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On February 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend the discovery deadline. (ECF No. 34.)
20
To date, Defendants have not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition. Local Rule 230(l).
21
Defendants’ counsel was electronically served with the motion through the Court’s CM/ECF system.
22
Local Rule 135; Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.
23
On December 22, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery, and granted
24
Defendants until January 16, 2015, to serve their responses to Plaintiff’s outstanding discovery
25
requests. (ECF No. 32.)
26
27
In his present motion, Plaintiff contends that Defendants have not submitted their responses to
his discovery requests. In order to adequately address Plaintiff’s pending motion to extend the
28
1
1
discovery deadline, the Court finds it necessary for Defendants to have a response to Plaintiff’s
2
motion.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty (20) days from the date of
3
4
service of this order, Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion to extend the discovery
5
deadline, filed February 9, 2015 (ECF No. 34).
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
March 3, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?