Gonzalez-Chavez v. City of Bakersfield et al

Filing 50

PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS and ORDER 45 48 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/8/2015. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, ESQ., SBN 096625 JOEL T. ANDREESEN, ESQ., SBN 152254 MARTHA J. ROSSITER, ESQ., SBN 256234 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES 2020 EYE STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 TELEPHONE: (661) 323-1400 FAX: (661) 323-0132 Attorneys for Plaintiff MIGUEL A. GONZALEZ-CHAVEZ 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 MIGUEL A. GONZALEZ-CHAVEZ, ) Case No. 1:12-CV-02053-JLT-GSA ) Plaintiff, ) PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS AND ORDER ) vs. ) (Docs. 45, 48) ) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CHRISTOPHER ) MESSICK, DEAN BARTHELMES, and DOES 1 ) to 100, Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) 21 Pursuant to the Court’s Order and after a good faith meet and confer between the parties, 22 the following stipulations are offered and agreed upon: 23 24 1. 25 There will be no comment or mention by Defense Counsel, or Defense witness Dr. Donald Huene regarding Huene’s opinion that based on the behavior of the plaintiff at the Independent 26 Medical Examination, Mr. Huene understood why the officers may have, and/or did used force 27 on Plaintiff. 28 Pretrial Stipulations and Order - 1 1 2. 2 There will be no comment, reference to or evidence of any previous criminal convictions pertaining to Plaintiff. 3 4 5 3. That all witnesses will be informed of the stipulations and instructed to adhere to this agreement. 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 9 Respectfully submitted, 10 11 Dated: January 7, 2015 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES 12 13 ____________________________ Martha J. Rossiter Attorney for Plaintiff 14 15 16 17 Dated: January 7, 2015 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 18 19 ____________________________ Michael Marderosian Attorney for Defendants 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 Pretrial Stipulations and Order - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?