Gonzalez-Chavez v. City of Bakersfield et al
Filing
50
PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS and ORDER 45 48 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/8/2015. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, ESQ., SBN 096625
JOEL T. ANDREESEN, ESQ., SBN 152254
MARTHA J. ROSSITER, ESQ., SBN 256234
RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES
2020 EYE STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
TELEPHONE: (661) 323-1400 FAX: (661) 323-0132
Attorneys for Plaintiff MIGUEL A. GONZALEZ-CHAVEZ
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
MIGUEL A. GONZALEZ-CHAVEZ,
) Case No. 1:12-CV-02053-JLT-GSA
)
Plaintiff,
) PRETRIAL STIPULATIONS AND ORDER
)
vs.
) (Docs. 45, 48)
)
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CHRISTOPHER
)
MESSICK, DEAN BARTHELMES, and DOES 1 )
to 100, Inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
21
Pursuant to the Court’s Order and after a good faith meet and confer between the parties,
22
the following stipulations are offered and agreed upon:
23
24
1.
25
There will be no comment or mention by Defense Counsel, or Defense witness Dr. Donald
Huene regarding Huene’s opinion that based on the behavior of the plaintiff at the Independent
26
Medical Examination, Mr. Huene understood why the officers may have, and/or did used force
27
on Plaintiff.
28
Pretrial Stipulations and Order - 1
1
2.
2
There will be no comment, reference to or evidence of any previous criminal convictions
pertaining to Plaintiff.
3
4
5
3.
That all witnesses will be informed of the stipulations and instructed to adhere to this
agreement.
6
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9
Respectfully submitted,
10
11
Dated: January 7, 2015
RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES
12
13
____________________________
Martha J. Rossiter
Attorney for Plaintiff
14
15
16
17
Dated: January 7, 2015
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
18
19
____________________________
Michael Marderosian
Attorney for Defendants
20
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 8, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
Pretrial Stipulations and Order - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?