Villescas v. Dotson et al
Filing
53
ORDER Granting Defendants' Second 51 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and Extending the Dispositive Motion Deadline to September 3, 2015, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/5/15. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALBERTO VILLESCAS,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
M.T. DOTSON, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12-cv-02068-SAB (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ SECOND
MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING
ORDER AND EXTENDING THE DISPOSITIVE
MOTION DEADLINE TO SEPTEMBER 3, 2015
[ECF No. 51]
Plaintiff Alberto Villescas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of
19
the United States Magistrate Judge. Local Rule 302.
20
21
On August 4, 2015, Defendants filed a second motion to modify the scheduling order and
extend the dispositive motion deadline.
22
Defense counsel submits that despite his best efforts, he has been unable to complete
23
preparation of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment by the August 4, 2015, deadline. Defense
24
outlines several other pending cases and deadlines which have impacted his ability to prepare and file
25
a motion for summary judgment in this case. Counsel requests until September 3, 2015, to prepare
26
and file their motion. Because Defendants have shown good cause to warrant an extension of the
27
dispositive motion deadline, the Court need not await the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response.
28
1
Based on a showing of good cause, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted to
1
2
and including September 3, 2015, to file their motion for summary judgment.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
August 5, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?