Villescas v. Dotson et al
Filing
67
ORDER Overruling Plaintiff's 65 Objections to Defendants' Request to Modify the Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/5/15. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALBERTO VILLESCAS,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
M.T. DOTSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12-cv-02068-SAB (PC)
ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST
TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER
[ECF No. 65]
Plaintiff Alberto Villescas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the
19
jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 34; Local Rule 302.
20
On September 3, 2015, Defendants filed a third motion to modify the scheduling order. (ECF
21
No. 55.) The Court granted Defendants’ motion on September 4, 2015, and extended the dispositive
22
motion deadline by seven days, i.e. September 10, 2015. (ECF No. 56.) In that order, the Court noted
23
that no further extensions of time would be granted, absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances,
24
not present therein. (Id.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on September 10, 2015.
25
(ECF No. 57.)
26
On November 4, 2015, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ third motion to modify the
27
scheduling order. (ECF No. 65.) Plaintiff contends that he been prejudiced and will be further
28
prejudiced by an extension of the dispositive motion deadline. (Id.)
1
1
Inasmuch as Defendants’ presented good cause for a short extension of the dispositive motion
2
deadline and filed a motion for summary judgment by the extended deadline, i.e. September 10, 2015,
3
Plaintiff’s objections to Defendants’ third motion for an extension of time is OVERRULED.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
November 5, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?