Bryant v. Romero et al

Filing 161

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Motions for Summary Judgment by Defendants Castellanos and Waddle, within Sixty (60) Days as to 92 and 96 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/27/2016. (60-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEVIN D. BRYANT,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

1:12-cv-02074-DAD-GSA-PC

vs.
R. ROMERO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT
OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY
DEFENDANTS CASTELLANOS AND
WADDLE, WITHIN SIXTY (60)
DAYS
(ECF Nos. 92, 96.)

17

On March 28, 2016, defendant E. Castellanos filed a motion for summary judgment,

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

(ECF No. 92), and on April 1, 2016, defendant C. Waddle filed a motion for summary
judgment, (ECF No. 96). Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of nonopposition to each of the motions within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule
230(l).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Within sixty (60) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file
an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to each of two motions for
summary judgment:
(1)

Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Castellanos on March
28, 2016; and

1

(2)

2
3

Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Waddle on April 1,
2016;

2.

4

If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with
prejudice, for failure to obey the court=s order and failure to prosecute.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 27, 2016

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE