Bryant v. Romero et al

Filing 173

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 172 Motion for Extension of Time to File Replies to Defendants' Oppositions to Motion to Extend Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/08/2016. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

KEVIN D. BRYANT,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

vs.
R. ROMERO, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

1:12-cv-02074-DAD-GSA (PC)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
(ECF No. 172.)
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE TO
FILE REPLIES TO DEFENDANTS’
OPPOSITIONS TO MOTION TO
EXTEND DISCOVERY

16

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. '

17

1983. On November 3, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for a twenty-one day extension of time to

18

file replies to Defendants’ oppositions to Plaintiff’s motion to extend discovery. (ECF No.

19

172.)

20

The Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff an extension of time. Accordingly, IT IS

21

HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted twenty-one days from the date of service of this

22

order in which to file replies to Defendants’ oppositions to Plaintiff’s motion to extend

23

discovery.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 8, 2016

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE