Bryant v. Romero et al

Filing 205

ORDER Granting 204 Joint Stipulation for a Seven-Day Extension of Time to Reply to Defendant Waddle's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/21/17. Deadline: 6/30/2017. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEVIN D. BRYANT, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 1:12-cv-02074-DAD-GSA-PC R. ROMERO, et al., ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR A SEVEN-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT WADDLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 204.) Defendants. 11 DEADLINE: June 30, 2017 12 13 Kevin D. Bryant (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil rights 14 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 20, 2017, Defendant Waddle and Plaintiff filed a 15 joint stipulation to extend the time for Defendant Waddle to file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition 16 to Defendant Waddle’s motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 204.) The parties have 17 stipulated to a seven-day extension of time, from June 23, 2017, until June 30, 2017. 18 Good cause appearing, the stipulation shall be granted. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. 21 GRANTED; and 22 2. 23 The stipulation filed by Defendant Waddle and Plaintiff on June 20, 2017, is Defendant Waddle is granted until June 30, 2017, to file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant Waddle’s motion for summary judgment. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 21, 2017 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?