Bryant v. Romero et al
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 56 , 63 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/9/16: Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief and/or motion for an alternative way of communicating with other inmates is DENIED. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEVIN D. BRYANT,
12
13
14
No. 12-cv-02074-DAD-DLB (PC)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
R. ROMERO, et al.,
(Doc. Nos. 56, 63)
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Kevin D. Bryant, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
18
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 26, 2012. (Doc. No. 1.) The
19
matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and
20
Local Rule 302.
21
On December 9, 2015, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and
22
recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief and/or motion for
23
alternate way of communicating with other inmates be denied. (Doc. No. 63.) Those findings
24
and recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections thereto
25
were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On February 11, 2016, plaintiff filed objections. (Doc.
26
No. 84.) Defendants did not file a reply.
27
28
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds that the
1
1
findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper legal analysis. As, the
2
assigned magistrate judge concluded, this court lacks jurisdiction to grant the specific relief which
3
plaintiff has requested.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1. The findings and recommendations, filed December 9, 2015, are ADOPTED in full;
6
and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief and/or motion for an alternate way of
7
8
communicating with other inmates is DENIED.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated:
March 9, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?