Carl Ethridge v. Doe
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, and DIRECTING Defendants to File a Further Response Within Thirty Days 24 , 32 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/12/15. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CARL ETHRIDGE,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
LAWRENCE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12-cv-02088-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, AND
DIRECTING DEFENDNATS TO FILE A
FURTHER RESPONSE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
[ECF Nos. 24, 32]
Plaintiff Carl Ethrdige is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On November 18, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which
20
was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and
21
Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No Objections were filed.
22
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
23
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
24
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
27
and
28
2.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 18, 2014, is adopted in full;
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED in its entirety; and
1
1
3.
Defendants are directed to file a further response to the operative complaint within
2
thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: January 12, 2015
6
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?