Carl Ethridge v. Doe

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 43 Motion to Extend the Dispositive Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/9/15. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CARL ETHRIDGE, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 v. RODRIGUEZ, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-02088-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION [ECF No. 43] Plaintiff Carl Ethrdige is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 16 On December 8, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline to 17 forty-five days after the district judge issues an order on Defendants’ exhaustion motion. (ECF No. 18 43.) On November 13, 2015, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending 19 to grant Defendants’ exhaustion motion. (ECF No. 42.) 20 21 Good cause having been presented to the Court, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants have forty-five days following the district judge’s order resolving their exhaustion motion. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 9, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?