Carl Ethridge v. Doe
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 43 Motion to Extend the Dispositive Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/9/15. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
CARL ETHRIDGE,
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
RODRIGUEZ, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12-cv-02088-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE
MOTION
[ECF No. 43]
Plaintiff Carl Ethrdige is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
16
On December 8, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline to
17
forty-five days after the district judge issues an order on Defendants’ exhaustion motion. (ECF No.
18
43.) On November 13, 2015, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending
19
to grant Defendants’ exhaustion motion. (ECF No. 42.)
20
21
Good cause having been presented to the Court, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants
have forty-five days following the district judge’s order resolving their exhaustion motion.
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 9, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?