Deeths v. Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford, et al

Filing 14

ORDER on STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint 13 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/19/2013. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 6/10/2013 at 08:30 AM at the United States Courthouse, 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5

David Sheuerman, SB#78132
Monique Shamun-Khasho, SB#78132
SHEUERMAN, MARTINI, TABARI, ZENERE & GARVIN
1033 Willow Street
San Jose, California 95125
[phone] Telephone
[phone] Facsimile
Attorneys for Defendant
LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
CHRISTINE DEETHS, an individual,

Case No: 1:12-cv-02096-LJO-JLT

10
Plaintiff(s),
11

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

v.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN’S
(Doc. 13)
HOSPITAL AT STANFORD, a California
corporation; JOHN STIRLING, Jr., individually;
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER, a
California non-profit corporation; CHRISTOPHER
HARRIS, individually; BAKERSFIELD
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, a California corporation;
ANTHONY THOMAS, individually; LEGACY
BEHAVIORAL SERVICES, INC., a California
corporation; TARA CRUZ, an individual; EDDIE
CRUZ, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,

19

Defendants.

20
21

The parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

22
23

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), the time for defendant LUCILE
PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD to respond to plaintiff Christine Deeths’

24
Complaint for Damages is hereby extended by 28 days. The new deadline to file a response to the
25
complaint is now April 16, 2013.
26
27
28

///
///
Page 1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 13, 2013

SHEUERMAN, MARTINI, TABARI, ZENERE & GARVIN

3
4

By:

5
6
7

/s/
DAVID SHEUERMAN
MONIQUE SHAMUN-KHASHO
Attorneys for Defendant
LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL AT
STANFORD

8
9
10

Dated: March 13, 2013

THE LAW OFFICES OF SHAWN A. McMILLAN, APC

11
12

By:

14

/s/
SHAWN A. McMILLAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHRISTINE DEETHS

15

ORDER

13

16

Before the Court is the third stipulation of the parties to allow Defendants additional time to

17

file their responsive pleading. (Doc. 13) There was no explanation provided in the first or second

18

stipulation why these extensions were needed and none is provided here. Therefore, the Court

19

ORDERS:

20

1. Defendants SHALL file their responsive pleading no later than April 16, 2013. No
further extensions will be authorized;

21

2. The mandatory scheduling conference is CONTINUED to June 10, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated:

26

March 19, 2013

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

27
9j7khijed
28
Page 2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT