Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nekekim Corporation et al
Filing
10
ORDER STRIKING 8 and 9 Judgments due to Clerical and Formatting Error; Case Remains CLOSED, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/8/13. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
NEKEKIM CORPORATION and
)
KENNETH W. CARLTON,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
1:13-cv-0010 AWI SKO
ORDER STRIKING
JUDGMENTS DUE TO
CLERICAL AND
FORMATTING ERROR
(Doc. Nos. 8, 9)
16
17
18
On January 3, 2013, the parties filed stipulations for the entry of final judgment. See
19
Doc. Nos. 5, 6. The Court signed the proposed final judgments, which were then entered on
20
January 7, 2013. See Doc. Nos. 8, 9. The case was closed on January 7, 2013.
21
On January 8, 2013, the Court was informed that the proposed orders that it had signed
22
contained non-substantive formatting/clerical errors. The parties, as represented by the Securities
23
Exchange Commission, agreed that signing of new final judgments and striking the old final
24
judgments was the appropriate course. In light of the representations made by the Securities
25
Exchange Commission, and the apparent agreement of the parties, in order to correct non-
26
substantive formatting/clerical errors, see Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 60(a), the Court will strike the
27
judgments entered on January 7, 2013, and issue replacement judgments.
28
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
3
4
The final judgments in this case that were entered on January 7, 2013 (Doc. Nos. 8, 9) are
STRICKEN;
2.
5
The judgments entered on January 7, 2013, are to be replaced with final judgments that
will be filed immediately following this order; and
6
3.
This case remains CLOSED.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
0m8i78
January 8, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
daw
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?