Allen v. Stanislaus County et al
ORDER to facilitate telephone call signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/6/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
COLUMBUS ALLEN, JR.,
ORDER TO FACILITATE TELEPHONE
STANISLAUS COUNTY, et al.,
Plaintiff Columbus Allen, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil rights
action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Communication between plaintiff’s attorney Joan
R. Camagong and her client is required in order to efficiently litigate this action to its conclusion.
By this order, the court directs the Warden and the correctional staff at California State Prison,
Solano (SOL), to facilitate a confidential telephone call between attorney Camagong and inmate
Columbus Allen, Jr. (AE-1543).
The Warden, Litigation Coordinator, and other correctional staff as needed at SOL
shall facilitate a confidential telephone call between Columbus Allen, Jr. and
The confidential telephone call shall be placed on Thursday, February 15, 2018,
to begin at 10:00 a.m. and shall continue, without interruption, for a maximum of
90 minutes or until completed, whichever is earlier. Correctional staff shall
initiate the phone call by calling Ms. Camagong at (415) 544-1921;
The telephone conversation shall be a confidential communication between
attorney and client and conducted so as not to be overheard by correctional staff or
others. Correctional staff may, however, keep inmate Allen under visual
surveillance during the conversation;
Failure to comply with this order may result in an order requiring the Warden of
SOL, or others responsible for the failure to comply, to appear before the court to
show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against them; and
The Clerk of the Court is ordered to serve this order by facsimile (707) 454-3429
and email on the Warden and Litigation Coordinator at SOL.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 6, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?