Allen v. Stanislaus County et al
Filing
29
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/24/2014. Show Cause Response due by 10/28/2014.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
COLUMBUS ALLEN, JR.
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
STANISLAUS COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-00012-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE
[ECF Nos. 22, 27]
Plaintiff Columbus Allen, Jr. is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On July 29, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The motion was served
20
by mail on Plaintiff at his address of record. In accordance with Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff had up to
21
and including August 22, 2014, to file an opposition to the motion. To date, Plaintiff has not
22
responded to Defendants’ motion. On September 2, 2014, Defendants filed a reply for failure of
23
Plaintiff to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to their motion to dismiss. Local Rule
24
230(l) of which this action is proceeding specifically states:
25
26
27
A responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and
file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the motion in question. Failure
of the responding party to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may
be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in
the imposition of sanctions.
28
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause why the action
1
2
should not be dismissed for failure to an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’
3
motion within thirty (30) days. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will
4
result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
September 24, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?