Allen v. Stanislaus County et al

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL; ORDER DENYING 22 , 34 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File a Further Response to Complaint Within Thirty (30) Days, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/12/2015. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

COLUMBUS ALLEN, JR.

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
STANISLAUS COUNTY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00012-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, AND
DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A
FURTHER RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE
OF THIS ORDER
[ECF Nos. 34, 39]

Plaintiff Columbus Allen, Jr. is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

20

On November 18, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

21

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and

22

Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No Objections were filed.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

24

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

25

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 18, 2014, is adopted in full;

3

2.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED; and

4

3.

Defendants are directed to file a further response to the operative complaint within

5

thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated: January 12, 2015

9

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2