Denton v. Pulido et al

Filing 34

ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to File Notice of Change of Address or SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute 33 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/30/14: Thirty-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRYAN D. DENTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 PULIDO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00017-AWI-BAM PC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS OR SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (ECF No. 33) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff Bryan D. Denton (“Plaintiff”) is a former county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in 19 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 20 January 4, 2013. Defendant Pulido filed an answer on April 25, 2014, and discovery opened in this 21 matter on April 29, 2014. 22 On September 26, 2014, the Court received notice that Plaintiff is no longer in custody at the 23 Sacramento County Main Jail. (ECF No. 33.) Plaintiff has not provided the Court with his current 24 address. 25 Pursuant to Local Rules 182 and 183, a pro se party is under a continuing duty to notify the 26 Clerk, the Court and all other parties of any change of address or telephone number. Local Rule 27 182(f), 183(b). Additionally, Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure . . . of a party to comply with 28 these [Local] Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any 1 1 and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Further, the failure of Plaintiff to 2 prosecute this action is grounds for dismissal. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability 3 Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 2006). 4 5 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall either: 6 (1) file a notice informing the Court and defendant of his current address; or 7 (2) show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 8 9 The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action without 10 prejudice. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: /s/ Barbara September 30, 2014 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?