Denton v. Pulido et al

Filing 36

ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/16/14. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 BRYAN D. DENTON, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. PULIDO, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:13-cv-00017-AWI-BAM PC ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (ECF No. 34) 18 19 Plaintiff Bryan D. Denton (“Plaintiff”) is a former county jail inmate proceeding pro se 20 and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated 21 this action on January 4, 2013. Defendant Pulido filed an answer on April 25, 2014, and 22 discovery opened in this matter on April 29, 2014. 23 On September 26, 2014, the Court received notice that Plaintiff was no longer in custody 24 at the Sacramento County Main Jail. (ECF No. 33.) Accordingly, on October 1, 2014, the Court 25 issued an order directing Plaintiff to file a notice of his current address or show cause in writing 26 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 34.) 27 On October 1, 2014, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. (ECF No. 35.) 28 1 1 Based on Plaintiff’s notice, the order to show cause issued on October 1, 2014, is 2 HEREBY DISCHARGED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: /s/ Barbara October 16, 2014 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?