Powell v. Madden, et al.

Filing 52

ORDER denying 50 Motion for initial disclosure signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 3/10/2014. (Lundstrom, T)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TONY EDWARD POWELL,
Case No. 1:13-cv-00057-RRB
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING
MOTION AT DOCKET 50

vs.
MADDEN, et al.,
Defendants.

At Docket 50 Plaintiff Tony Edward Powell, a federal prisoner appearing pro se,
filed a document entitled “Petition for Initial Disclosure.” It appears from that document that
Powell opposes the Defendants’ Motion for Clarification re: Scheduling and Planning
Order,1 which this Court granted and amended the Scheduling and Planning Order.2 The
Court having considered Powell’s arguments finds them to be without substantial merit.
The Scheduling and Planning Order, as amended, conforms to the requirements of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the Petition for Initial Disclosure at
Docket 50 is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of March, 2014.
S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Docket 38.

2

Docket 41.

ORDER REGARDING MOTION AT DOCKET 50