Xiong v. City of Merced, et al.

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Request to Extend Page Limits From Motion for Summary Judgment 43 . Defendants and Plaintiffs may file briefs (motion and opposition briefs) up to 50 pages, exclusive of a table of contents, a table of cases, and any supporting declarations and exhibits. Any reply brief may be up to 30 pages in length. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/27/2015. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

KONG MENG XIONG, and
LUH XIONG
Plaintiffs,

17
v.

18
19

Case No. 1:13-cv-00083-SKO
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'
REQUEST TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS
FROM MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(Doc. 43)

20

CITY OF MERCED, et al.,

21

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

22
23
24

On May 26, 2015, Defendants filed a letter brief requesting a page-limit extension on their

25 motion for summary judgment. Defendants explain they wish to file one summary judgment
26 motion addressing the claims of both Plaintiffs. To adequately address all the claims against each
27 of the five Defendants, however, Defendants seek to extend the motion page limit from 30 to 50
28 pages.

1

As there are multiple plaintiffs and defendants, a number of claims at issue, and because

2 Defendants plan to address each Plaintiff's claims together in one motion, both Defendants and
3 Plaintiffs may file briefs (motion and opposition briefs) up to 50 pages, exclusive of a table of
4 contents, a table of cases, and any supporting declarations and exhibits. Any reply brief may be up
5 to 30 pages in length.
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 27, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2