Silveira et al v. State of California et al
Filing
11
ORDER re Stipulation to extend time to respond to 1 Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/12/2013. (Response to Complaint Deadline: 2/28/2013) (Figueroa, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
JOAN A. MARKOFF
Chief Counsel, Bar No. 121787
WILL M. YAMADA
Deputy Chief Counsel, Bar No. 226669
FROLAN R. AGUILING
Assistant Chief Counsel, Bar No. 235874
DAVID D. KING
Labor Relations Counsel, Bar No. 252074
DAVID M. VILLALBA
Legal Counsel, Bar No. 258974
California Department of Human Resources
State of California
1515 S Street, North Building, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95811-7258
Telephone: (916) 324-0512
Facsimile: (916) 323-4723
E-mail: david.king@calhr.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
CARL SILVEIRA and GEORGETTE
PICKETT, as individuals, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
) Case No. 1:13-CV-00084-AWI-BAM
)
) ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND
) TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA
)
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
)
REHABILITATION; CALIFORNIA
)
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL
)
ADMINISTRATION; CALIFORNIA
)
DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH; and )
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-1-
1
In consideration of the parties’ stipulation to extend the time for Defendants to respond to
2
Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and good cause having been shown, it is ORDERED that the deadline for
3
Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, originally set for February 14, 2013, shall be
4
extended to February 28, 2013.
5
6
7
Approved As To Form:
Dated:
February 12, 2013
8
By: /s/ Majed Dakak
MAJED DAKAK
Attorney for Plaintiffs
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Dated:
14
/s/ Barbara
February 12, 2013
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
15
16
A. McAuliffe
10c20kb8554
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?