Cox v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Filing 6

ORDER VACATING defendant's Motion to Dismiss, document #5 , noticed for hearing on 3/4/2013 before Judge Anthony W. Ishii. The Court has deemed the matter suitable for decision without oral argument and will take the matter under submission as of that date. Order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/28/2013. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 10 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) NICOLE COX, et al., 1:13-CV-104 AWI JLT ORDER VACATING MARCH 4, 2013 HEARING 11 12 13 Defendant has noticed for hearing and decision a motion to dismiss under Federal Rules 14 of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The matter was scheduled for hearing to be held on March 4, 2013. 15 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Plaintiffs were required to file either an opposition or a notice of 16 non-opposition no later than February 19, 2013. Plaintiffs failed to do so. Due to Plaintiffs’ 17 failure to file a timely opposition or notice of non-opposition, they are in violation of the Local 18 Rules and are not entitled to be heard at oral argument in opposition to the motion. See Local 19 Rule 230(c). The Court has reviewed Defendant’s motion and the applicable law, and has 20 determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 21 230(h). 22 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of March 4, 23 2013, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of March 4, 2013, the Court will 24 take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ciem0h February 28, 2013 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?