Dish Network L.L.C., et al v. Gonzalez
Filing
25
ORDER for Service ofr Process by Registered Process Server. All-n-One Legal Support is appointed to serve process of the writ in this action; and Plaintiffs shall file proof of service of the writ of execution within 10 days of service of the writ of execution. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/18/2015. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DISH NETWORK, LLC., et al.,
12
13
Case No. 1:13-cv-00107-LJO-SKO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER FOR SERVICE OF PROCES BY
REGISTERED PROCESS SERVER
v.
(Doc. 22)
14
15
ARMOANDO GONZALEZ
16
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
17
18
19
I.
INTRODUCTION
On March 12, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a request for an order appointing a registered process
20 server to execute the judgment entered against Defendant on August 26, 2013.
(Doc. 15.)
21 Plaintiffs' ex parte request seeks the appointment of All-n-One Legal Support, which utilizes
22 registered California process servers to serve writs of execution. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiffs represent
23 that the service will utilize process servers who are competent and not less than 18 years of age,
24 would not be a party to this action, and all servers are California process servers duly registered in
25 all counties in California. Plaintiffs state that the request will result in substantial savings in time
26 and travel fees of the United States Marshal, who will remain the levying officer pursuant to
27 California Code of Civil Procedure § 699.080.
28
1
2
II.
DISCUSSION
The execution of final judgments is governed by Rule 69(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
3 Procedure. Rule 69(a) provides as follows:
4
5
6
7
(1) Money Judgment; Applicable Procedure. A money judgment is enforced by a
writ of execution, unless the court directs otherwise. The procedure on execution –
and in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution – must
accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located, but a federal
statute governs to the extent it applies.
...
8
9 Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a). Pursuant to Rule 69(a), post-judgment enforcement proceedings must
10 comply with California law. Credit Suisse v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for Cent. Dist. of Cal., 130 F.3d 1342,
11 1344 (9th Cir. 1997); Hilao v. Estate of Marcos, 95 F.3d 848, 850 (9th Cir. 1996).
12
Under California law, a registered process server may levy under a writ of execution on
13 property specified in California Code of Civil Procedure § 699.080(a). A registered process server
14 is a person registered as a process server pursuant to the Business and Professions Code. See Cal.
15 Civ. Pro. Code § 481.250 (citing Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22350 to 22360). This authority is
16 limited to cases where the levy does not involve the possibility of taking immediate possession of
17 the property.
18
Pursuant to Plaintiffs' representation that All-n-One Legal Support will employ a process
19 server who is at least 18 years of age, competent, not a party to this litigation, and duly registered
20 in all counties in California, the request to appoint All-n-One Legal Support will be granted. Any
21 process server employed by All-n-One Legal Support must be at least 18, not a party to this
22 litigation, and registered as a California process server.
Plaintiffs shall file a certificate of
23 completed service of the writ of execution in this case when it is accomplished.
III.
24
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
25
For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
Plaintiff's request is GRANTED;
27
2.
All-n-One Legal Support is appointed to serve process of the writ in this action;
28
and
2
1
3.
2
Plaintiffs shall file proof of service of the writ of execution within 10 days of
service of the writ of execution.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 18, 2015
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?